Information on Personal Injury
Getting Compensation For Your Auto Injuries
Dealing with the aftermath of a serious injury caused by the negligent actions of another individual can be a frightening and confusing task. With your focus on recovering from your injuries, it can be difficult to address the legal issues relating to your accident. The advice of an experienced lawyer can make all the difference in finding quick and favorable resolutions to your personal injury needs, allowing you to focus on getting back on your feet without worrying about medical bills or mortgage payments.
I am attorney David Grossman at the Law Office of David M. Grossman, and I provide comprehensive personal injury representation to clients throughout the Baltimore, Maryland, area who are injured in an automobile accident. To schedule a free consultation to discuss your personal injury needs with me, contact my office online or call 410-752-6088. When you call my office, you will speak directly with me.
Personal Injury – An Overview
Personal injury lawsuits are filed by people (or their representatives) injured due to the negligence of someone else. The injury may be either physical or emotional, and it can arise from a variety of sources or types of conduct. Some of the most common types of personal injuries that give rise to legal liability on the part of the wrongdoer include slips and falls, automobile accidents, assaults and battery, medical malpractice, and injuries caused by defective consumer or pharmaceutical products. The general goal of personal injury actions is to determine who was responsible and to compel them to compensate the injured person for the losses sustained. If you or someone you know has been injured by the careless or reckless actions of another, contact a personal injury attorney at Law Office of David M. Grossman in Baltimore, Maryland, to learn more about your rights.
Personal injury damages
Personal injury lawyers work hard to ensure that their clients receive the damages to which they are entitled by law. Some of the items for which injured parties are legally entitled to compensation include lost wages, past and future medical expenses, damages for both physical and emotional pain and suffering, and damages for disfigurement or disability. Sometimes, a close family member of the injured person, such as his or her spouse, may also be entitled to damages. This award is often referred to as loss of consortium damages, which is intended to compensate the loved one for the loss of the injured or deceased person’s services, benefits and companionship.
Other kinds of damages may be awarded, depending on the laws of the state where the lawsuit is brought and the facts of the particular case. These include “hedonic damages,” which are awarded to compensate the plaintiff for the loss of enjoyment of activities that he or she once valued but can no longer participate in as a result of the injuries suffered. In addition, “punitive damages” may be awarded when the defendant’s conduct was particularly egregious and the court or jury determines that the defendant should be punished by paying an amount above and beyond the plaintiff’s actual damages. Punitive damage awards may also serve to deter the defendant and others from engaging in similar wrongful conduct in the future.
“Legal causation” of personal injuries
Not every injured plaintiff is entitled to recover damages for the injury he or she sustains. Besides the injury, the plaintiff must also establish, through credible and relevant evidence, that the defendant is legally responsible for his or her injuries. The plaintiff must present proof of causation both in terms of “actual causation” and “proximate/legal causation.” Actual causation is determined by literal cause and effect. Whether legal causation is established will depend on the facts and circumstances of the particular case.
In some personal injury actions, legal causation may be established if the plaintiff can show that the defendant engaged in intentional conduct. This means that the wrongdoer intentionally or purposefully harmed the plaintiff or knew that the conduct in which he or she engaged gave rise to a substantial likelihood that harm would result.
Negligence and strict liability
Other personal injury actions are based on a looser concept of fault called negligence. Under the negligence theory, a defendant is held liable for the results of action or inaction when an ordinary person in the same position should have foreseen that the conduct would create an unreasonable risk of harm to others. Still other types of personal injury actions are based on strict liability, which is a no-fault system under which liability may be established regardless of the fault of the various parties, including the injured party. Strict liability is often applied in products liability cases, such as when a manufacturer or seller of a defective product puts that product into the hands of consumers and users of the product are injured.
The defendant can be held liable for actions taken, or for actions not taken. A driver who fails to stop at a red light and hits another vehicle and injures the other driver or passengers is liable based on her negligent acts. A property owner who fails to clear the ice and snow from the front steps of a business open to the public may be liable for his inaction if a patron falls and breaks her leg when attempting to enter the premises.
Defenses to liability in personal injury cases
In some situations, the defendant’s conduct, while questionable, may not give rise to damages. If, for instance, a plaintiff knowingly and willfully chooses to encounter a known hazard, then the law provides that he or she has assumed the risk of injury and therefore the defendant should not be liable. The “assumption of the risk” theory may apply, for example, in a case in which the plaintiff engaged in a friendly game of tackle football and another player broke his arm. In such a case, the plaintiff may be unable to recover for his injuries because he knew of the risks inherent in the game and willingly chose to encounter them.
The following are possible defenses to personal injury claims.
- Statute of limitations. Statutes of limitations are laws setting forth the period within which a lawsuit must be initiated.
- Sovereign immunity. Sovereign immunity provides that certain government agents and entities are immune from civil liability for actions taken in the course of their official duties.
- Intentional misuse. Injuries caused by a plaintiff’s intentional misuse of a product, particularly in disregard of provided instructions or warnings, may be a defense in a products liability case.
- Contributory or comparative negligence. Contributory or comparative negligence exists where the plaintiff’s own conduct caused or contributed to his or her injuries.
A personal injury lawyer can explain these and other defenses and determine whether they apply to a particular case.
Contact a personal injury lawyer
Personal injury actions often require a lawyer’s careful examination of the surrounding facts and circumstances to determine whether the defendant is legally responsible for the plaintiff’s injuries. Many personal injury attorneys work on a contingency fee basis, meaning that they charge no legal fees unless and until the defendant pays the damage award. A personal injury attorney at Law Office of David M. Grossman in Baltimore, Maryland, can look at the facts of your case and determine whether you have a legally valid claim, how soon you must act to preserve your rights, the damages to which you may be entitled and whether you may be entitled to some type of financial benefits before your lawsuit is even resolved.
DISCLAIMER: This site and any information contained herein are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice. Seek competent legal counsel for advice on any legal matter.